HC seeks BMC’s response on utilizing developer’s property as quarantine centre – india information

Advertisement
Advertisement


The Bombay excessive courtroom has directed the Brihanmumbai Municipal Company (BMC) to answer a plea by a developer from Andheri in search of clarification on how lengthy the civic physique would preserve possession of a constructing constructed beneath the slum rehabilitation authority (SRA) scheme.

The BMC had taken possession of the finished constructing within the first week of Could to make use of it as a Covid-19 quarantine facility however didn’t inform the developer of the length of its use or quantity of compensation it will pay, the developer then approached the courtroom.

A division bench of justice R D Dhanuka and justice Abhay Ahuja whereas listening to a petition filed by Sahyog Properties was knowledgeable by advocate Nilesh Gala via video conferencing that the developer had undertaken an SRA mission at Andheri and had accomplished building of a few buildings. Nevertheless, building of different buildings have been held up because the civic physique had not issued different certificates required to proceed work on the mission.

Advertisement

Gala additional submitted that because the constructing acquired by the BMC didn’t have an Occupation Certificates or a No Objection Certificates, the civic physique could be solely accountable within the occasion of any untoward incident and the developer couldn’t be held answerable for it. He additional submitted that in gentle of this the courtroom ought to direct the BMC to expedite granting of certificates for the finished buildings within the mission in addition to disclose the length until when the constructing would stay in its custody.

Extra authorities pleader Jyoti Chavan submitted that the state had not been served a replica of the petition. After listening to the petitioner’s declare she knowledgeable the bench that a comparable petition had come up earlier on Could 11 with nearly similar prayers and therefore each petitions could possibly be heard collectively.

After listening to the submissions, the bench directed the BMC’s advocate Rupali Adhate to file an affidavit inside two weeks and to say the interval for which the constructing was requisitioned and the compensation quantity that may be paid to the petitioner and posted the petition to be heard together with the sooner petition on June 2.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »